JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 11, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Carlos Orlando Alba Sierra Vs. Ministerio De Educacion Nacional Y La Secretaria De Educacion De Cundinamarca

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Civil Del Circuito De Ubate Y El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Cundinamarca Sala Civil – Familia – Agraria. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Cundinamarca Sala Civil – Familia – Agraria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia del superior jerárquico común
  • Competencia según quien aparezca como demandado en el escrito de la demanda
  • Prevalencia del derecho sustancial, economía, celeridad y eficacia aún cuando no sea repartida reglamentariamente
2 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por el ciudadano Carlos Orlando Alba Sierra contra el Ministerio de Educacion Nacional y la Secretaria de Educacion de Cundinamarca, al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cundinamarca, Sala Civil - Familia - Agraria, para que le de tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado Civil del Circuito de Ubate, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.